nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS)
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:10:37 +0200
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:02:21PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
information. But... (aside from any local safety net filter), it's quite a leap to allow a single entity to inject blackholes for any prefix.Spamhaus has been distributing their DROP list by BGP for years. The world hasn't ended, and I can't recall the last time it had a plausible false positive.
The Spamhaus context is different: I know people take that DROP BGP feed and converting it into ACLs applicable locally on their mailservers, I don't know of people injecting these prefixes straight into the core. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) John Kristoff (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Job Snijders (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) John Kristoff (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) John Levine (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Job Snijders (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Alexandre Snarskii (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Christian Seitz (Oct 09)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Job Snijders (Oct 09)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) John Kristoff (Oct 09)
- RE: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Naslund, Steve (Oct 09)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Hank Nussbacher (Oct 09)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) Job Snijders (Oct 08)
- Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS) William Herrin (Oct 08)