nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP Shaping Hardware
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:40:25 +0500
Hi On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Мурат Каипов <mkkaipov () gmail com> wrote:
Hello Guys. What about DPI solutions? We use Cisco SCE8000 for traffic policing and billing purposes. Also, as we in MNO market we use PCRF tools too.
Cisco SCE8000 or even smaller boxes are pretty expensive and then require couple of other hardware to run the middleware which manages the device. Not a good idea. We bought it for the same purpose but its not scalable and very bulky in management. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui
Current thread:
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware, (continued)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Nick Hilliard (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Skeeve Stevens (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Nurul Islam Roman (Oct 20)
- RE: ISP Shaping Hardware Tony Wicks (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Skeeve Stevens (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Rafael Possamai (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Eduardo Schoedler (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Rafael Possamai (Oct 20)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Alex Nderitu (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Мурат Каипов (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Ankit Agrawal (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Ankit Agrawal (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 21)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Josh Luthman (Oct 21)