nanog mailing list archives

RE: Industry standard bandwidth guarantee?


From: keith tokash <ktokash () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:57:13 -0700

I'm sorry I should have been more specific.  I'm referring to the *percentage* of a circuit's bandwidth.  For example 
if you order a 20Mb site to site circuit and iperf shows 17Mb.  Well ... that's 15% off, which sounds hefty, but I'm 
not sure what's realistic to expect.  

And beyond expectations, I'm wondering if there's a threshold that industry movers/shakers generally yell at their 
vendor for going below, and try to get a refund or move the link to a new port/box.




To: ktokash () hotmail com
Subject: Re: Industry standard bandwidth guarantee?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:02:53 -0400
CC: nanog () nanog org

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:24:46 -0700, keith tokash said:

Is there an industry standard regarding how much bandwidth an inter-carrier circuit should guarantee?

How are you going to come up with a standard that covers both the uplink from
Billy-Bob's Bait, Fish, Tackle, and Wifi, where a fractional gigabit may be
plenty, and the size pipes that got clogged in the recent Netflix network
neutrality kerfluffle?

And where your PoPs are (and how many) matters as well - if you have a peering
agreement with another carrier, and you exchange 35Gbits/sec of traffic, the
bandwidth at each peer point will depend on whether you peer at one location,
or 5, or 7, or 15.....

                                          

Current thread: