nanog mailing list archives

Re: 2000::/6

From: Tarko Tikan <tarko () lanparty ee>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:54:41 +0300

hey,

2000::/64 doesn't make much sense either.


No and it was obviously not what was configured.

But something like 2001:7d0:1:1::1/64 misconfigured on interface as2001:7d0:1:1::1/6 becomes 2000::/6


--
tarko

Current thread:

2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)
  - Re: 2000::/6 Wouter Prins (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Job Snijders (Sep 10)
  - Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 12)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 13)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Jimmy Hess (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 15)
    - Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 16)