nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scotland ccTLD? - armchair quarterbacking
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:48:27 -0700
On 9/17/14 8:03 AM, manning bill wrote:
Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread. If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations, then: 1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
This is not actually true. We have prior art on countries not liking the code they were assigned, and successfully lobbying for it to be changed. This is one of the entanglements that I referred to previously. :) Doug
Current thread:
- Re: Scotland ccTLD?, (continued)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Doug Barton (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Doug Barton (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Rubens Kuhl (Sep 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Larry Sheldon (Sep 16)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Tei (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Matt Palmer (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? - armchair quarterbacking manning bill (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? - armchair quarterbacking Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? - armchair quarterbacking Doug Barton (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? - armchair quarterbacking Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Scotland ccTLD? Larry Sheldon (Sep 16)