nanog mailing list archives

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions


From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:42:37 +0200

Hello

My 2 cents
You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you have just to play with the API.

Regards

Fabien

Le 12 août 2015 à 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com> a écrit :



Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
From: "marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr>
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906 () yahoo fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

anybody from this impressive list ?:

https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers

-- Marcel



Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?

Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?

Thanks,

Ramy


Current thread: