nanog mailing list archives
AW: Branch Location Over The Internet
From: Jürgen Jaritsch <jj () anexia at>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:49:30 +0000
Patrick, which CCR did you test? Best regards -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] Im Auftrag von Patrick Cole Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 00:49 An: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org> Betreff: Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Josh, Just an FYI, I've successfully used these two EoIP implementations on Linux: https://code.google.com/p/linux-eoip/ https://github.com/bbonev/eoip So I wouldn't say EoIP is Mikrotik only -- these interop perfectly with Mikrotik. I started using these due to stability problems we were having with CCRs. Pat Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 06:32:55PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Eoip is Mikrotik only Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 11, 2015 6:28 PM, "Colton Conor" <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:EoIP seems to be what I am looking for, however this recent Mikrotik session says: EoIP could be a solution for tunneling L2 over L3. ? EoIP disadvantages: ? Fragmentation of L2 frames over multiple L3 packets ? Performance issues ? VPLS advantages: ? No fragmentation. ? 60% more performance then EoIP. So it sounds like VPLS might be better than EoIP? I can't find much about EoIP online, so is this a Mikrotik only protocol? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, J?rgen Jaritsch <jj () anexia at> wrote:Hi, Mikrotik Routerboard + (encrypted) Ethernet over IP (EoIP). If required: MPLS+OSPF+BGP in the EoIP for additional features. Build the pseudo Layer2 with two dedicated boxes. In the HQ you can hand it over directly to the MX80 and at the new office you can work withsmallboxes like Cisco 7301 (also available with redundant PS) or if you need more ports: 19xx ... #) cheap setup #) can easily transport a few hundred Meg #) you can use refurb parts if required #) big community support for Mikrotik Routerboards #) encrypted transport possible #) works with dynamic IPs #) MPLS in the EoIP allows you to transport VRFs with BGP signaling Etc etc Best regards J?rgen Jaritsch Head of Network & Infrastructure ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 E-Mail: jj () anexia at Web: http://www.anexia.at Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstra?e 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 -----Original Message----- *From:* Colton Conor [colton.conor () gmail com] *Received:* Dienstag, 11 Aug. 2015, 20:23 *To:* NANOG [nanog () nanog org] *Subject:* Branch Location Over The Internet We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office istakingfull BGP routes from tier 1 providers using a Juniper MX80. They are establishing their first branch location, and need the branch location to be able to securely communicate back to headquarters, AND be able to use a /24 of headquarters public IP addresses. Ideally thedeviceat the HQ location would hand out public IP address using DHCP to theotherside of the tunnel at the branch location. We know that in an ideal world it would be wise to get layer 2 transport connections from HQ to the branch location, but lets assume that is notanoption. Please don't flood this thread about how it could be an option because it's not at this time. This setup will be temporary and inservicefor the next year until we get fiber to the branch site. Let's assume at the branch location we can get a DOCSIS cable internet connection from a incumbent cable provider such as Comcast, and that provider will give us a couple static IP address. Assume as a backup, we have a PPPoE DSL connection from the ILEC such as Verizon who gives us a dynamic IP address. What solution could we put at the HQ site and the branch site to achieve this? Ideally we would want the solution to load balance between the connections based on the connections speeds, and failover if one is down. The cable connection will be much faster speed (probably 150Mbps down and 10 Upload) compared to the DSL connection (10 download and 1 upload). Ifweneed more speed we can upgrade the cable modem to a higher package, butforDSL that is the max speed so we might have to get multiple DSL lines. The cable solution could always be used as the primary, and the DSLconnectioncould only be used as backup if that makes things easier. If you were to do this with Juniper or Cisco gear what would you have at each location? What technology would you use? I know there is Pepewave and a couple of other software solutions thatseemto have a proprietary load balancing solutions developed, but I would prefer to use a common Cisco or Juniper solution if one exists. There will be 50 users at the branch office. There is only one branch location at this time, but they might expand to a couple more but under10.
-- Patrick Cole <z () wwwires com> Senior Network Specialist World Without Wires PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221 Ph: 0410 626 630
Current thread:
- Branch Location Over The Internet Colton Conor (Aug 11)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Job Snijders (Aug 11)
- RE: Branch Location Over The Internet Jürgen Jaritsch (Aug 11)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Colton Conor (Aug 11)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Josh Luthman (Aug 11)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Patrick Cole (Aug 12)
- AW: Branch Location Over The Internet Jürgen Jaritsch (Aug 12)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Colton Conor (Aug 11)
- AW: Branch Location Over The Internet Jürgen Jaritsch (Aug 11)
- Re: Branch Location Over The Internet Mike Hammett (Aug 11)