nanog mailing list archives
Re: BRAS sugestion
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:22:10 +0200
On 14/Aug/15 18:07, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
We just bought a couple of MX480s for B-RAS to replace some aging Cisco 7206/VXRs. Not racked or powered yet (showed up yesterday), but hope to have one of them online for testing next week. Our initial test with an eval MX-80 verified functionality.
I like that Juniper finally dropped further development of the dedicate BRAS code. It had become annoying. Mark.
Current thread:
- BRAS sugestion Julian Eble (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Eduardo Schoedler (Aug 14)
- Message not available
- Re: BRAS sugestion Clayton Zekelman (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mark Tinka (Aug 14)
- Message not available
- Re: BRAS sugestion Alastair Johnson (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mike Lyon (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Alistair Mackenzie (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Peter Kristolaitis (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Alistair Mackenzie (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mark Tinka (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Dave Taht (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Baldur Norddahl (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Clinton Work (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Tarko Tikan (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mick O Donovan (Aug 14)