nanog mailing list archives
Re: Drops in Core
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:16:51 -0400
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
Youre saying that the probability of packet drop at peering points would roughly match that at the edge. Is it? I thought that most core switches have minimal buffering and really do cut-through forwarding. The idea is that the traffic that they receive is already shaped by the upstream routers.
Hi Glen, It a capacity question. Several core networks [cough Verizon cough] intentionally under-provision the "settlement-free" peering links to other core networks. You can't cut-through when the destination interface already has a queue of packets waiting to be sent. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- Drops in Core Glen Kent (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Mike Hammett (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core William Herrin (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Glen Kent (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core William Herrin (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Owen DeLong (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core William Herrin (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Glen Kent (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Job Snijders (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Drops in Core Job Snijders (Aug 16)
- Re: Drops in Core Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Drops in Core William Herrin (Aug 16)
- Re: Drops in Core Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 17)
- Re: Drops in Core Glen Kent (Aug 15)
- Re: Drops in Core Justin Wilson - MTIN (Aug 17)