Re: Quakecon: Network Operations Center tour

[Laurent Dumont <admin () coldnorthadmin com>]

I recently wrapped up a 1300 players with gigabit connections where we 
had a single 5gig link. We never saturated the link and peaked at 
3.92Gbps for a new minutes. Bandwidth usage peaks on the first day and 
settles down after that (the event was during an entire weekend starting 
on friday). If I recall correctly, average was around 2Gpbs.

We did not have a steam/web cache and I expect it might reduce even more 
the actual load on actual BW usage.

On 8/2/2015 7:32 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Also, 2 Gbps for 4,400 people?  Pretty lackluster compared to European
> > events.  30C3 had 100 Gbps to the conference building.  And no NAT:
> > every host got real IP addresses (IPv4 + IPv6).
> ietf, >1k people, easily fits in 10g, but tries to have two for
> redundancy.  also no nat, no firewall, and even ipv6.  but absorbing or
> combatting scans and other attacks cause complexity one would prefer to
> avoid.  in praha, there was even a tkip attack, or so it is  believed;
> turned off tkip.
>
> the quakecon net was explained very poorly.  what in particular provides
> game-quality latency, or lack thereof?  with only 2g, i guess i can
> understand the cache.  decent bandwidth would reduce complexity.  and
> the network is flat?
>
> randy