nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:50:43 +0200
On 18/Aug/15 15:31, Tim Durack wrote:
Not sure if I really want to get into using DSCP bits for basic IP service though.
There are use-cases, but they would mostly be internal. Mark.
Current thread:
- Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits manning (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Fwd: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)