nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:37:09 +0100
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Max Tulyev wrote:
we got an issue today that announces from Cogent don't reach Hurricane Electric. HE support said that's a feature, not a bug. So we have splitted Internet again?
Was there ever an adjacency between 6939 and 174 in the IPv6 DFZ? Maybe bgpmon or dyn can comment on information collected over the last few years.
I have to change at least one of my uplinks because of it, which one is better to drop, HE or Cogent?
I recommend You base your decision on metrics relevant to your business, such as network performance, positive/negative experiences with their NOC, support from your account manager, pricing, how easy it was to reach them (local tail needed or not), etc. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Max Tulyev (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Christopher Morrow (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Max Tulyev (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Andrew Kirch (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Alarig Le Lay (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jeff Walter (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul WALL (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Christopher Morrow (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Geiger (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jeff Walter (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 06)