Re: Nat

[Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali () hrins net>]

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16/Dec/15 18:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
>
> > In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are
> > facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat
> > problems!
>
> This could be a function of the size of your ESP.
>
> The 5Gbps ESP can handle 256,000 NAT sessions, while the 200Gbps ESP
> will do 4,000,000 NAT sessions with a per-second setup rate of 300,000
> sessions.
>
> Of course, it makes little sense to upgrade if you run out of sessions
> before you hit the NAT throughput ceiling, so other vendors may be more
> commercially palatable.
>
> Mark.

Thats right but as you mentioned that its commercially palatable, however I don’t know if the other vendors are the 
same performance as ASR1000!  this was my question if someone recommend another vendor.