nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 14:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Just in case I missed the /s on there:
Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.
It does and it isn't. http://www.x-arf.org/ -- Hugo hugo () slabnet com: email, xmpp/jabber also on Signal ---- From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton () mnsi net> -- Sent: 2015-12-25 - 14:12 ----
Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response. Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used. Sent from my iPhoneOn Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote: why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machinesThis is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP/MIME digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Lee (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Clayton Zekelman (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake TR Shaw (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Andrew Kirch (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Nick Hilliard (Dec 25)