nanog mailing list archives

Re: Broadband Router Comparisons


From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:12:25 -0600

Based over what has been leaked, announced, or passed as pork barrel since
9/11, its probably time a tin foil hat factory was created to speed up the
issuance of said hats.
On Dec 27, 2015 10:10 PM, "Hugo Slabbert" <hugo () slabnet com> wrote:

On Sun 2015-Dec-27 20:58:18 -0600, Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
wrote:

And now that the new bill has passed, they (along with many others) will be
"mishandling" your data often and legally with 3 letter agencies and other
corporations. :(
On Dec 27, 2015 8:48 PM, "James Downs" <egon () egon cc> wrote:


On Dec 27, 2015, at 09:43, Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com> wrote:

Hence: https://on.google.com/hub/

The device looks cool, and sounds cool, but what data does google end up
with, and what remote management can they do? Their policy pages aren’t
exactly clear, and they’ve mishandled personal data a number of times
previously.


Probably wise to be keep the tinfoil hat within arm's reach, I think.  My
ref was strictly "yep, they appear to be making a play at the home
controller market via a broadband router trojan horse" and not in any way
an endorsement or comment on the merits of the device.

--
Hugo

hugo () slabnet com: email, xmpp/jabber
PGP fingerprint (B178313E):
CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E

(also on textsecure & redphone)



Current thread: