nanog mailing list archives

Re: interconnection costs


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:48:41 -0500

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Baldur Norddahl
<baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:
On 24 December 2015 at 03:04, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:39:11 -0800, Reza Motamedi said:
Aren't availability, guaranteed service and remote hands an incentive to
do
peering inside a third party colocation?

Sure.  But there are places in the US where you have to decide whether the
cost of lighting 300 miles of fiber to the colo is worth the benefits, when
the other option is lighting fiber to a street cabinet across town.


Also remember that 300 miles of fiber is going to go through a dozen of
street cabinets to get there.

be sure that you either:
  a) plan for a second path for when the backhoe arrives
  b) understand that you may slosh 'lots' of traffic 'elsewhere' when A happens

if you don't want to ship/install/etc a device in a cage in 'equinix'
but rather use a Xconnect/fiber provider solution you're moving your
failure domains around a bit.


Current thread: