nanog mailing list archives
RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS
From: "Darden, Patrick" <Patrick.Darden () p66 com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:23:09 +0000
And when your opinion is an acknowledged universal constant, I will tip my hat to you. In the meantime, your argument is extremely soundbitey--sounds great, but stupid. --p -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:09 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Checkpoint IPS On 6 Feb 2015, at 21:27, Darden, Patrick wrote:
I understand the whole argument against state, and dismiss it.
One can 'dismiss' the speed of light in a vacuum or the Planck constant, but that doesn't exempt one from their constraints. ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- Re: Checkpoint IPS, (continued)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 05)
- RE: Checkpoint IPS Terry Baranski (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Patrick Tracanelli (Feb 05)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Ray Soucy (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Patrick Tracanelli (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Ca By (Feb 07)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS BPNoC Group (Feb 08)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Roland Dobbins (Feb 08)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)
- RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS Darden, Patrick (Feb 06)
- Re: Checkpoint IPS Colin Johnston (Feb 06)
- RE: Checkpoint IPS Raymond Burkholder (Feb 05)