nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
From: "Crawford, Scott" <CrawfordS () evangel edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:57:37 +0000
On Jan 30, 2015, at 07:37 , Owen DeLong <owen@delong> wrote:
/48 for all customer sites is not at all unreasonable and is fully supported by ARIN policy.
Where Bill is correct is that some customers may have more than one site. The official policy definition of a site is a single building or structure, or, in the case of a multi-tenant building or structure, a single tenant within that building. Yes, this could technically mean that a college dorm contains thousands of sites and could justify thousands of /48s.
Is this your recommendation for colleges? Or, are you simply pointing out a possible interpretation of ARIN policy?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Baldur Norddahl (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion William Herrin (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Tore Anderson (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Baldur Norddahl (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Tore Anderson (Feb 01)
- RE: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Crawford, Scott (Feb 06)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion David Barak (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Dustin Melancon (Feb 10)