nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dynamic routing on firewalls.


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:17:59 -0800

A good firewall can also be a good router.

Of course you can find firewalls that are crappy routers and you can find routers that are crappy firewalls, but 
generally, the two are not mutually exclusive.

Owen

On Feb 6, 2015, at 08:39 , Bill Thompson <Billt () mahagonny com> wrote:

Just because a cat has kittens in the oven, you don't call them biscuits. A firewall can route, but it is not a 
router. Both have specialized tasks. You can fix a car with a swiss army knife, but why would you want to?
-- 
Bill Thompson
billt () mahagonny com

On February 5, 2015 7:19:43 PM PST, Jeff McAdams <jeffm () iglou com> wrote:

On Thu, February 5, 2015 20:02, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Ralph J.Mayer <rmayer () nerd-residenz de>
wrote:
a router is a router and a firewall is a firewall. Especially a
Cisco ASA
is no router, period.

Man-o-man did I find that out when we had to renumber our network
after
we got bought by the French.

Oh, I'll just pop on a secondary address on this interface... What?

Needed to go through fits just to get a hairpin route in the thing.

The ASA series is good at what it does, just don't plan on it acting
like
router IOS.

Sorry, but I'm with Owen.

Square : Rectangle :: Firewall : Router

A firewall is a router, despite how much so many security folk try to
deny
it.  And firewalls that seem to try to intentionally be crappy routers
(ie, ASAs) have no place in my network.

If it can't be a decent router, then its going to suck as a firewall
too,
because a firewall has to be able to play nice with the rest of the
network, and if they can't do that, then I have no use for them.  I'll
get
a firewall that does.


Current thread: