nanog mailing list archives
RE: Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations
From: "Darden, Patrick" <Patrick.Darden () p66 com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:07:18 +0000
+10 The original SANS DDOS task force, and many others since, have emphasized this. Filter your Outbound! Bogons for obvious reasons, BGP3 to keep routing multipliers, non-internals to keep from being used as an amplifier network, the list goes on. Be a good network neighbor. --p -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 4:29 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations . . . This reminds me to bring up a point that can't be stressed enough: it's just as important to block *outbound* traffic as inbound. Ask Anthem. Or Target. Or the ghosts of the Trojans. ;) . . . .
Current thread:
- RE: Intrusion Detection recommendations, (continued)
- RE: Intrusion Detection recommendations Warsaw LATAM Operations Group (Feb 13)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Jimmy Hess (Feb 13)
- RE: Intrusion Detection recommendations Keith Medcalf (Feb 13)
- RE: Intrusion Detection recommendations Scavotto, Brian (Feb 18)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Joe Klein (Feb 19)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Jimmy Hess (Feb 14)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Charles N Wyble (Feb 14)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Rich Kulawiec (Feb 14)
- RE: Intrusion Detection recommendations Colin Bodor (Feb 15)
- RE: Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Darden, Patrick (Feb 19)
- RE: Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Darden, Patrick (Feb 19)
- Re: Intrusion Detection recommendations Jimmy Hess (Feb 14)