nanog mailing list archives
Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
From: Jim Richardson <weaselkeeper () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:12:42 -0800
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
I am not a lawyer (in fact, I Am Not An Isp), but my understanding is this is pretty well settled. And it is not even weird or esoteric. If the content on the site is against the law in the jurisdiction in question, it is not legal (duh). Otherwise, yes it is, and no ISP gets to decide whether you can see it or not.
Which is the "jurisdiction in question" ? the originating website? the ISP? the CDN network's corporate home? my home?
Current thread:
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Livingood, Jason (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] deleskie (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Owen DeLong (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Owen DeLong (Feb 27)