nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
From: Stephen Lee <stephen.lee () congressmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 03:38:56 +0000
. Yn ----- Reply message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> To: "Marcin Kurek" <notify () marcinkurek com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> Subject: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Date: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 9:36 PM
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
this remains contentious. there are those who think having the control plane not congruent to the data plane is a recipe for really fun debugging and has other issues. randy
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Stephen Lee (Dec 31)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Marcin Kurek (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Tony Varriale (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Baldur Norddahl (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Jeff Tantsura (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mike Hammett (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Ca By (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Baldur Norddahl (Jan 01)