nanog mailing list archives

Re: Recommended L2 switches for a new IXP


From: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:17:20 -0500

For many people eliminating L2 switching and building on top of a L3 
network is a good thing, especially if you are using BGP as the control 
plane. 

I'm not sure I follow the two routers with 40GE interfaces if you are just 
building L2 domains to interconnect people.  

Phil 



On 1/20/15, 8:04 AM, "Marian Ďurkovič" <md () bts sk> wrote:

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:37:35PM -0500, Phil Bedard wrote:
I think in fairly short order both TRILL and 802.1AQ will be depercated 
in 
place of VXLAN and using BGP EVPN as the control plane ala Juniper 
QFX5100/Nexus 9300. 

We also evaluated VXLAN for IXP deployment, since Trident-2 introduced HW
support for it. But VXLAN does *not* create a network for you, it relies 
on
some existing underlying IP network, on top of which VXLAN creates 
stateless
tunnels.

By using TRILL, we could connect 4 switches into a ring (or any other
reasonable topology) and have a fully functional network with 
shortest-path
"routing" of L2 packets.

With VXLAN, we'd need at least two additional IP routers with bunch of
40GE interfaces to perform the functions TRILL supports out of the box.

Regards,

  M.




Current thread: