nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:45:29 -0500
Paul Nash <paul () nashnetworks ca> writes:
Ruckus is also *way* easier to configure than Cisco. Some of the Cisco folk that I know think that that is a point in favour of Cisco, as it adds to job security :-)
That matches my experience with Cisco 802.11 kit. Way too many knobs exposed, and guidance on how to set them is thin on the ground. Sensible defaults and quick to configure on the Ruckus kit. -r
Current thread:
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office, (continued)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Hammett (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Lyon (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Seth Mos (Jan 29)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Paul Stewart (Jan 29)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Lyon (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Jared Mauch (Jan 29)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Paul Stewart (Jan 29)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Edwards, Jermaine (Jan 30)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Hammett (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Paul Nash (Jan 30)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Rob Seastrom (Jan 30)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Sean Harlow (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Hammett (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Jared Mauch (Jan 29)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Carlos Alcantar (Jan 30)