nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?


From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:56:49 -0700

Waaay to many variables to answer the question. Each deployment is
different and requires proper engineering and experience...

-Mike


On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>
wrote:

A lot.  It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying
to design said infrastructure.
On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:

So....ultimately,  what's the answer?  A huge number of low cost,  low
power WAPs?  Eager readers want to know.   :)

what was unclear about the following?

Randy Bush wrote:
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network
setup?
To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900
...
having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with
all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large
deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once).  i have seen
embarrassing messes with all of the above.  i have concluded that the
critical component is the engineer.





-- 
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
mike.lyon () gmail com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon


Current thread: