nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:49:10 +0200
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 30/Jun/15 16:24, Job Snijders wrote:In this specific situation, for a small to medium sized network, it might be prudent to apply an outbound prefix-filter on all transit & peering sessions and thus only allowing prefixes which actually belong to downstream customers and the network itself.I say that regardless of size, deploy the ultimate solution as the network is only bound to grow. It's harder for folk to undo old habits as they become more entrenched.
Nothing is ever regardless of anything :-) I would forsee issues if i'd try to add an eleven megabyte prefix-list on all devices in the network. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Re: NTT->HE earlier today (~10am EDT), (continued)
- Re: NTT->HE earlier today (~10am EDT) Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Joe Abley (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Sandra Murphy (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Justin M. Streiner (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Sandra Murphy (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Graham Beneke (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Justin M. Streiner (Jun 30)