nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:05:55 -0700
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 15/06/2015 19:09, William Herrin wrote:Anycast + TCP = much pain, for reasons which should be obvious.This was presented at some conference or other a couple of years ago:https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf
From that otherwise encouraging preso:
"What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan to be dead before customers demand IPv6". I am pretty sure the authors are still alive(?). I have been using anycast at a small scale on mesh networks, for dns, primarily. Works.
Nick
-- Dave Täht What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
Current thread:
- Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- RE: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jürgen Jaritsch (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- RE: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jürgen Jaritsch (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Randy Bush (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Matt Palmer (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)