nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set
From: Maqbool Hashim <maqbool () madbull info>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:34:46 +0000
Hi, The destination host is sending an ACK+RST with the source port set to zero. The destination IP is always one of the two hosts that are generating the SYN packets with a destination port of 0. The destination port however is hard to match up to a source port in the original SYN packet due to the fact that we don't have all the packets. It's actually going to be difficult to get the access and procedural sign off etc. to run tcpdump on the machines involved. What might be easier is to set up a span port for the hosts access port on the switch and grab that via the collector laptop I have. Thanks, MH ________________________________________ From: Marcin Cieslak <saper () saper info> Sent: 17 June 2015 10:30 To: Maqbool Hashim Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Maqbool Hashim wrote:
It is always the same destination servers and in normal operations these source and destination hosts do have a bunch of legitimate flows between them. I was leaning towards it being a reporting artifact, but it's interesting that there are a whole set of Ack Reset packets from the destination hosts with a source port of 0 also.
So the destination host is sending ACK+RST with the *source* port set to zero, or the *destination* port?
Does this not indicate that it probably isn't a reporting artifact?
I would just tcpdump on one of the source machines to find out. ~Marcin
Current thread:
- Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Marcin Cieslak (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Mark Milhollan (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)