nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:15:22 -0400
Charles N Wyble <charles () thefnf org> writes:
Use a git repository. Make tagged releases. This enables far easier distributed editing, translating, mirroring etc. And
A fine idea in theory, but not quite as much traction in reality as bcp38. Creating a need for a BCP for retrieving BCPs so that you get the right version rather than typing "git clone" and erroneously referring to whatever is tagged "-develop" seems like a Bad Plan. It's also not a really reasonable method for distributing point-in-time documents once people are done with collaborating on creating them. Most end consumers will not care about the change history.
you can still do whatever release engineering you want.
Sure.
A wiki is a horrible solution for something like this.
Agree 100% -r
Current thread:
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested, (continued)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Andrew Sullivan (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Rick Casarez (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Mel Beckman (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Lee Howard (Mar 13)
- RE: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Phil Bedard (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested William Norton (Mar 14)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Rob Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Charles N Wyble (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Rob Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Harlan Stenn (Mar 15)
- Supporting network time software development/maintenance (was: Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested) Rob Seastrom (Mar 16)
- Re: Supporting network time software development/maintenance (was: Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested) Harlan Stenn (Mar 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Lee Howard (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Andrew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)