nanog mailing list archives
Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:47:10 -0400
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:27:14 -0400 Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:John's statement was in the context of general advice to be included in a BCOP document and I felt compelled to say "whoa there".
ok, that was my reaction as well.
My intent was for it to be taken as a DDoS mitigation response option, not as a general practice.
ok, I read over the bcop, I'm certain I wouldn't have used some of the words on the page, I'm certain that there are things suggested which I disagree with (mass filtering at your edge, if you are an ISP, all the time)... but I've not got the energy to poke too much more at this document :( and folk will find their balance anyway.
Current thread:
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Yardiel D . Fuentes (Mar 23)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP John Kristoff (Mar 23)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Rob Seastrom (Mar 24)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Maxwell Cole (Mar 24)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Christopher Morrow (Mar 24)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Rob Seastrom (Mar 25)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP John Kristoff (Mar 25)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Christopher Morrow (Mar 25)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Rob Seastrom (Mar 24)
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP John Kristoff (Mar 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Scott Weeks (Mar 24)
- RE: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP Chuck Church (Mar 25)