nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:32:45 -0400
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com> wrote:
Nothing could possibly go wrong with turning loose a poorly coded software tool to make automated legal threats in the most litigious nation on earth.
you'd think, but they've been doing this for nigh on 8 yrs at least at this point.
Current thread:
- IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Theodore Baschak (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 10)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthew Black (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Seth Arnold (Oct 12)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance seth (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bob Evans (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)