nanog mailing list archives
Re: WiFI on utility poles
From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:00:41 -0400
This sounds like a hypothetical complaint, AFAIK none of the members of the CableWiFi consortium are deploying APs outside of their footprint. Since most of the APs use a cable modem for their backhaul it's not really feasible to be without at least one broadband option (the cable MSO) and be impaired by the CableWiFi APs. Now, there is one potential exception to this I'm aware of which is Comcast's Xfinity on Campus service, but I'd expect the number of colleges they're servicing that aren't already getting cable broadband service to approach zero. http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20150909_Comcast_streams_onto_college_campuses.html https://xfinityoncampus.com/login Having said all of that, I'd agree that a good radio resource management approach would benefit all of us, including the CableWiFi guys. http://www.cablelabs.com/wi-fi-radio-resource-management-rrm/ Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms -------------------------------- On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
On Sep 10, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internetaccess is via fixed wireless .This is a huge deal for those people like myself that depend on fixed wireless for access at home because there is no broadband available despite incentives given by cities and states and the federal government. The local WISPs are good at coordinating access in these ISM bands amongst themselves but when someone appears with a SSID without doing a peek at the spectrum (note: not a site survey, but actual spectrum view w/ waterfall, as site survey only checks for the channel width that the client radio is configured for, not al the 10, 15, 8, 30mhz wide variants). It’s just poor practice to show up and break something else because you can’t be bothered to notice the interference or noise floor you created. I suspect the hardware that Comcast is using doesn’t notice this interference or adjacent channel issues. With the FCC aiming to let cell carriers also clog the 5ghz ISM band it’s only going to get worse. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: WiFI on utility poles, (continued)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Chris Boyd (Sep 10)
- RE: WiFI on utility poles James E. Pratt (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Hunter Fuller (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Livingood, Jason (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Mike Hammett (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Shane Ronan (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Matt Hoppes (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Shane Ronan (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Bryan Fields (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Jared Mauch (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Scott Helms (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Yury Shefer (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Scott Helms (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Mike Hammett (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Mike Lyon (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Mike Lyon (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Livingood, Jason (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Josh Luthman (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles mikea (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles Mike Lyon (Sep 10)
- Re: WiFI on utility poles John Levine (Sep 10)