nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft blocking mail
From: Tei <oscar.vives () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:39:17 +0200
On 18 September 2015 at 04:48, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf () dessus com> wrote:
You mean to say that you have to enable blanket remote code execution authority in order to submit a problem report to Microsoft? What a crock of crap. Thus I will never recommend to anyone that they use Microsoft products for anything whatsoever, especially not anything in the "Microsoft Cloud" virus distribution system. Being blocked is probably a good thing ...
CGI forms that do the validation in the serverside are not up to modern expectations*. You want to do validation clientside. Like everything, is a tradeoff. This is how modern things are build :D Something something something Gödel, Escher, Bach, rendering a document takes N cycles and can be calculate before hand. Running a program takes M cycles and can't be calculate before hand, M can be bigger than 6 times the lifespan of the universe or be infinite ... * is a social problem of expectations management. -- -- ℱin del ℳensaje.
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Michael O Holstein (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Josh Luthman (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Hugo Slabbert (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Josh Luthman (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Josh Luthman (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Mike Hammett (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Hugo Slabbert (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Grant Ridder (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Josh Luthman (Sep 17)
- RE: Microsoft blocking mail Keith Medcalf (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Tei (Sep 18)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Marcin Cieslak (Sep 18)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Michael O Holstein (Sep 17)
- Re: Microsoft blocking mail Chris Garrett (Sep 17)