nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN?
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura () ericsson com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:32:52 +0000
Hi, In most well designed IP routing stacks the way to get to a labeled (tunneled) next hop is decoupled from a service, so if a service requires such next hop it is upto (usually RIB) to return one (best, multiple might exist) which would be used for forwarding. If it is a Segment Routed one so it will then be used. Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Mohan Nanduri <mohan.nanduri () gmail com> Date: Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 12:59 PM To: Jason Lixfeld <jason () lixfeld ca> Cc: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN?
No, it works with L2VPNs also. Outer label is going to be SR label and inner label is your L2VPN label. Cheers, -Mohan On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jason Lixfeld <jason () lixfeld ca> wrote:Hello! I've been doing some reading recently on Segment Routing. By all accounts, it seems that the (only?) implementation for SR supports L3VPN. Am I dumb and just missing the L2VPN bits, or is L3VPN simply the extent of the first generation? Sent from my iPhone
Current thread:
- Segment Routing for L2VPN? Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN? Mohan Nanduri (Sep 20)
- Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN? Jeff Tantsura (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN? Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 23)
- Re: Segment Routing for L2VPN? Mohan Nanduri (Sep 20)