nanog mailing list archives
Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises
From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:22:53 -0500
Stephen Satchell wrote on 9/24/2015 11:00 AM:
On 09/24/2015 07:05 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:However, the ultimate way to control routing would be to advertise more specific prefixes via the path that you want traffic to flow.Tried that, no joy.
I could only assume then that your peers were either not accepting your advertisements or there was an error in your configuration. All routers will choose the most specific route they have when performing destination based routing. This overrides how the route was installed (static, connected, dynamic) or any metrics considered within each routing protocol for its best path selection.
Current thread:
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises, (continued)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Jared Mauch (Sep 23)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Clinton Work (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Mark Tinka (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Mark Tinka (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Stephen Satchell (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Jason Bullen (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Bob Evans (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Stephen Satchell (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)