nanog mailing list archives
Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 05:09:35 +1000
In message <571105A6.3040607 () nvcube net>, Nikolay Shopik writes:
On 15/04/16 17:51, John R. Levine wrote:Putting mobiles into a handful of non-geographic codes as they do in Europe wouldn't work because the US is a very large country, long distance costs and charges were important, and they needed to be able to charge more for a mobile call across the country than across the street.I would like to add that Russian mobiles in non-geographic codes and have free incoming calls (it wasn't until 2006) and also very large territory. But that created internal roaming prices within country. So if you are making call not from your home region you'll pay more also you may pay for incoming call too (unless you pay for such option to make your abroad incoming calls free)
Australia is about the area as the US and has always had caller pays and seperate area codes for mobiles. Call costs are independent of the mobiles location unless you are OS where the callee picks up the OS component of the voice call (incoming SMS's are usually free even if you are OS, they slug you with replies however). I've also got a US SIM and had my credit run to zero dollars with the phone turned off due to the sillyness of the US system. No calls or SMS being delivered but I'm still getting charged. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences, (continued)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences tim () pelican org (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John R. Levine (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences tim () pelican org (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Nikolay Shopik (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Mark Andrews (Apr 15)
- Re: [lists] Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Peter Beckman (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences David Barak via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Mark Andrews (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Baldur Norddahl (Apr 17)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 15)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 20)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 20)