nanog mailing list archives
Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences
From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:11:57 -0700
This makes me wonder what the 'market value' of a 212 DID is. I have seen them anywhere from $55 to $600 from providers specifically saying "buy this DID and port it out to your carrier of choice". On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
In a message written on Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:49:37AM +0100, tim () pelican org wrote:Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how/ why US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line? The other answers address the history here better than I ever good, but I wanted to point out one example I hadn't seen mentioned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_917 917 was originally a mobile only area code overlay in New York City. For reasons that are unclear to me, after that experiement it was decided that the US would never do that again. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Current thread:
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences, (continued)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Julien Goodwin (Apr 26)
- RE: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Ray Orsini (Apr 26)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Blair Trosper (Apr 26)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 27)
- RE: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Matthew Black (Apr 27)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 20)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Dan Lacey (Apr 20)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences RT Parrish (Apr 24)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Leo Bicknell (Apr 18)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Eric Kuhnke (Apr 18)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 18)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jay Hennigan (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Peter Beckman (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jay Hennigan (Apr 13)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John Levine (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences John R. Levine (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Larry Sheldon (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 14)
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences Owen DeLong (Apr 14)