nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arista Routing Solutions
From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:47:45 +0000
On 2016-04-28 11:06, Alain Hebert wrote:
Well, Once you eliminate the ~160k superfluous prefixes (last time I checked)... This is a none issue. Some work on some sort summary function would keep those devices alive... but we all know there is more money to be made the faster the device become obsolete :(
Can you explain how this works? How can a router determine which prefix is superfluous? How does it cope when a suppressed prefix is withdrawn or a more specific prefix is added? Is this just one of those 'it works some of the time' solutions or is this something that can be done safely with an appropriate algorithm?
Thanks, Laszlo
Current thread:
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions, (continued)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Saku Ytti (Apr 24)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Ryan Woolley (Apr 26)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Paras Jha (Apr 26)
- RE: Arista Routing Solutions Timothy Creswick (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Ryan Woolley (Apr 24)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Colton Conor (Apr 25)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Ryan Woolley (Apr 26)
- RE: Arista Routing Solutions Peter Kranz (Apr 27)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions lincoln dale (Apr 27)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Alain Hebert (Apr 28)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 28)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Patrick Cole (Apr 28)
- Re: Arista Routing Solutions Ryan Woolley (Apr 28)