nanog mailing list archives
RE: carrier grade fax boards?
From: Robert Jacobs <rjacobs () pslightwave com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:06:24 +0000
I would not consider any fax board "carrier grade" that uses sip .... sip to pots for faxes is still hit and miss. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:36 AM To: Ryan Finnesey <ryan () finnesey com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: carrier grade fax boards? On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:30:23 -0000, Ryan Finnesey said:
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations on carrier grade fax boards that are SIP based?
What would "carrier grade" even *mean* for a fax board?
Current thread:
- carrier grade fax boards? Ryan Finnesey (Apr 27)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- RE: carrier grade fax boards? Ryan Finnesey (Apr 27)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Faisal Imtiaz (Apr 28)
- RE: carrier grade fax boards? Robert Jacobs (Apr 28)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Mike Hale (Apr 28)
- RE: carrier grade fax boards? Colin Bodor (Apr 28)
- RE: carrier grade fax boards? Ryan Finnesey (Apr 27)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Pete Mundy (Apr 28)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: carrier grade fax boards? Kraig Beahn (Apr 28)