nanog mailing list archives
Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo...
From: Richard Hicks <richard.hicks () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:17:05 -0800
We had some ASR1001s routers reboot. Looks like we hit this bug: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb01730 On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com> wrote:
Had a set of Cisco ASR1004s running 15.4(3)S1 (on IOS-XE 03.13.01.S) all restart at around midnight UTC, and all with `Last reload reason: Watchdog`, with those boxes being at separate DCs in different regions. I'm assuming when I call TAC I'll get a "whoops; sorry". -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Sun 2017-Jan-01 01:02:24 +0000, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote: [root@hayden ~]# ntpq -premote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================ ================== LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 20d 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 -clock.xmission. 132.163.4.103 2 u 169 256 377 66.078 -1.302 0.164 xclock.sjc.he.ne 10.200.208.2 2 u 13 256 315 65.689 999.633 2.015 +tock.usshc.com .GPS. 1 u 87 256 377 26.930 -0.550 0.121 *ntp.your.org .CDMA. 1 u 43 256 217 23.339 0.544 0.069 Our batch system went belly up, but other than that, no other apparent leap second issues. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
Current thread:
- Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Matthew Huff (Dec 31)
- Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Hugo Slabbert (Dec 31)
- Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Richard Hicks (Dec 31)
- Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Jon Lewis (Dec 31)
- Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Richard Hicks (Dec 31)
- Re: Someone didn't get the leap second memo... Hugo Slabbert (Dec 31)