nanog mailing list archives

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:54:42 -0600 (CST)

Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with someone actually connected to them. Usually it's an 
ISP that's a few AS hops away from Netflix. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Reynolds" <josh () kyneticwifi com> 
To: "Steven Miano" <mianosm () gmail com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G 
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a 
Netflix open connect appliance. 

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" <mianosm () gmail com> wrote: 

fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page. 

...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to 
speedtest.<ISP>.net|com than some of those others. 

There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew). 

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston <johnstong () westmancom com> 
wrote: 

For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net 
on 
our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include 
more 
detailed results. 

I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
have a local instance of: 

* Speedtest.net 

* Sourceforge.net/speedtest 

* Dslreports.com/speedtest 

Are there others? What is your preferred one and why? 

Thanks, 
Graham 




-- 
Miano, Steven M. 
http://stevenmiano.com 



Current thread: