nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue


From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:54:16 -0400

They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:

Todd Underwood wrote:
Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?

are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?

Nick

T
On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred () web2objects com> wrote:

Anyone else aware of it?





Current thread: