nanog mailing list archives
Re: PCH Peering Paper
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:04:24 -0800
The premise above therefore devolves to: Since most of the traffic is to those networks, then most of the bits flow over contracted peerings. Perhaps “most” can be argued, but obviously a significant portion of all peering bits flow over contracted sessions. Hopefully we can all agree on that.
There’s greater complexity here, however… Many of the bits that flow flow over several networks between their source and destination. Likely the vast majority of bits traverse at least 3 autonomous systems in the process. So when you want to count traffic that went over a non-contract peering session vs. traffic that went over a contract peering session, how do you count traffic that traverses some of each? Owen
Current thread:
- PCH Peering Paper Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Fredrik Korsbäck (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Livingood, Jason (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- re: PCH Peering Paper Livingood, Jason (Feb 12)
- RE: PCH Peering Paper Phil Bedard (Feb 12)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Niels Bakker (Feb 12)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Livingood, Jason (Feb 16)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 16)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Bill Woodcock (Feb 17)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: PCH Peering Paper Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- re: PCH Peering Paper Livingood, Jason (Feb 12)