nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & Google IPv6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:17:26 +0900
i suspect that what is goiing on here is actually a good sign of ipv6 becoming commercially real. for the last couple of decades, ipv6 has been connected via <puke> tunnels, an unusual amount of free peering, packets carried by donkeys over the mountains, anything that worked. as ipv6 starts to become commercially real, traffic exchange agreements are becoming commercial. so the free peering etc. are going away. it sure would be nice if the tunnels and donkeys went away too. welcome to the not my mother's internet. yes, virginia, there really are tier-1 settlement-free providers. but keep whining, it moves a lot of packets; not. randy
Current thread:
- Cogent & Google IPv6 Ian Clark (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Matt Hoppes (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Max Tulyev (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Matthew D. Hardeman (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Constantine A. Murenin (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Matt Hoppes (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Baldur Norddahl (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Paras Jha (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)