Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 3/Feb/16 09:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> Typically the features that fall by the wayside first are: reasonable
> port buffers, qos knobs and decent lag/ecmp hashing support for mpls
> packets.

Cisco, in general, are suffering here, i.e., QoS on LAG's.

IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR suffer massively.

We find that Junos does a better job here.

Mark.