nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:24:42 +0700
On 29 Feb 2016, at 6:26, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
Around here they are currently voting on a law that will require unsampled 1:1 netflow on all data in an ISP network with more than 100 users.
That's interesting, given that most larger routers don't support 1:1. ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Todd Crane (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Baldur Norddahl (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Baldur Norddahl (Feb 28)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 28)