nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:44:34 +0900
Purposefully hosting an "inflammatory" site that the Russians or Chinese object to is a valid way to get your AS null routed inside those countries. Same goes for Turkey, India, Australia...
luckily this is not true in the US. oh wait.
We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ?
luckily all american and ukranian isps respond to abuse in minutes. moving right along ... randy
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake Richard Hesse (Jan 02)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)