nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:33:48 +0900
With this I meant that I can measure something, but only within a subset of the entire path a packet might traverse.
considering your original hypothesis was about length of paths, this seems a kind of dead end. you might get a modest improvement by turning off hot potato :)
so not end-to-end
which is the problem
And what might be true for us might not be true for others.
yes. but if it actually measured what we wanted, it would be a useful measurement. but it doesn't. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 25)