RE: ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl

["Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>]

WHo cares?  TOG (your third party shooting what you loosly call un-authorized video) is not a party to the contract and 
therefore does not give a flying fuck what it says.  Nor do the parties to the contract have anything to say about the 
matter.

So in other words, TOG is free to do whatever he pleases and there is nothing that anyone can legally do about it.  Get 
that down your gullet and choke on it.

In fact, TOG can sue anyone who attempts to unlawfully prevent him from exercizing his unrestricted rights.

Get that in ya, you fascist commie bastard.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+kmedcalf=dessus.com () nanog org] On Behalf
> Of bzs () theworld com
> Sent: Thursday, 21 January, 2016 13:04
> To: Matthew Black
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: RE: ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl
>
>
> On January 20, 2016 at 23:56 Matthew.Black () csulb edu (Matthew Black)
> wrote:
>  > Enclosed stadiums won't have to worry about remote drones until they
> get smart enough to open doors on their own. Not sure why the NFL gets
> uptight about unauthorized recording. Most sporting events have little
> value once the event is over.
>
> Control. Which might include contractual obligations like against
> showing some big-shot coach or player picking his nose or crying or
> whatever (tho spitting seems ok even on artificial turf yuck!),
> upskirts, whatever. Maybe certain people in attendance particularly in
> the expensive boxes don't want to be shown (e.g., with their, um,
> girlfriends), etc etc etc.
>
> At least some money would be in bloopers or scandals.
>
> --
>         -Barry Shein
>
> Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             |
> http://www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
> The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*