nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:23:05 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Owen DeLong wrote:
Good that one of them is finally backing down on the previous stupidity, but for a variety of reasons, I wish it had been T-mo.
Why? IPv6 only with IPv4 transported over it is clearly the way to go for the future, it makes more sense to have Apple support this mode once for their devices, than it is for every mobile provider to have to support IPv4v6 with all the drawbacks, and then migrate people again to IPv6+AFTR solution in a few years.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration, (continued)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Owen DeLong (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Owen DeLong (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Damian Menscher via NANOG (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Owen DeLong (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Ricky Beam (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Jared Mauch (Jan 04)
- RE: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Jacques Latour (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 05)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Owen DeLong (Jan 05)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 05)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Neil Harris (Jan 04)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration George, Wes (Jan 05)
- Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration Justin M. Streiner (Jan 04)